
Is one of
the players freer than the other? Are they both victims of different kinds of
sexism? Is it possible that they are both free? It would be easy to say that
the German girl was free to play as comfortable as she wants while the Egyptian
one was forced by her religion to cover her body and head. But is it that easy?
The rules
about how to dress in female beach-volley are now a bit lighter, but until 2012
the sides of the down part of the bikinis couldn’t be larger than seven
centimeters. Was that in order to make it more comfortable for competing? Was
that a way of sexualizing the players? Would those dresses derivate attention
from the performance of the players to their bodies?
In 2012 the
rules admitted other uniforms (like the one of the Egyptian player) because
“many countries have religious or cultural demands”, like Richard Baker,
speaker of the International Beach-Volley Federation said. Not because women
had the right to choose over their dresses, but because some religions or
cultures wouldn’t allow their women to play dressed with just a bikini.
So, did
both players choose their dresses freely? They both said so, but, were those
“free” decisions really free or were they based on sexist subjacent ideas that
see the female body as something to hide or to show but not as something to
compete?
And maybe
the biggest question of all: why are we debating about the way sportswomen
dress but we don’t do the same with sportsmen?

(Published in the Blog of Aspire. Manufactury of Change to promote the Aspire Conference 2016)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario